Since MGTOW are sent their own way, so should their taxes

To all you cunts out there who think I am a basement dwelling neck beard, who lives with my mom, I regret to inform you that I actually have a fairly high profile six figure STEM job and I have been able to save a good amount of money over the past couple decades or so.  Although I like to work, I have decided that the 30% tax rate that the govmint steals from me each year, is no longer worth it, so I will be quitting my job next year.  Every dollar of taxes that is stolen from me is another dollar that goes to feed some irresponsible cunt and its badboy spawn, who would never even give me a chance since I am boring, dull, shy, intelligent, reliable, responsible and a host of other virtues which women today consider a turnoff.  If you are a man and you are working in a job where you have to pay any more than the bare minimum in taxes, you are FUNDING the system who which has made provider men not only useless, but laughed at by society.  Since I only need about $100 a day or so to live, which interest on my account easily earns, my taxes will be a fraction of what they are currently, and I will no longer be a tax slave to women or the state.  I am starting my research into countries overseas, with no feminism, where I can retire.  Here is yet another video, of another guy who has had enough.

19 thoughts on “Since MGTOW are sent their own way, so should their taxes

  1. You might also want to read this:
    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-3081480/Hell-hath-no-fury-like-woman-scorned-rejected-attractive-man-makes-women-cruel-men.html
    Hell hath no fury like a woman scorned! Being rejected by an attractive man makes women cruel to other men
    Researchers found that being rejected by an attractive man actually makes a woman more likely to turn down an unattractive one
    It is as if distancing herself from the unattractive man helps her retain the idea that she is high status, cushioning the blow of the rejection
    By Sophie Freeman For Mailonline
    Published: 11:44 GMT, 14 May 2015 | Updated: 12:52 GMT, 14 May 2015
    It’s the plotline of many a cheesy rom-com: Woman rejected by a good-looking lothario is scooped up by the Average Joe who’s been waiting in the wings all along.
    But in real life it may be a very different story, according to a study.
    Researchers found that, rather than being grateful for the fall-back option, being rejected by an attractive man actually makes a woman more likely to turn down an unattractive one, and to describe him harshly.
    +2
    Not interested: Scientist say that women who have been rejected distancing themselves from an unattractive man to help her retain the idea that she is high status, cushioning the blow of the rejection
    It is as if distancing herself from the unattractive man helps her retain the idea that she is high status, cushioning the blow of the rejection.
    ‘Participants rejected by the attractive man also derogated the unattractive man even when the unattractive man offered acceptance,’ said the psychologists from the University of Toronto.

    ‘Social psychologists theorise that individuals seek connection following rejection.
    ‘However, accepting connection from a low status other may imply that one is of similarly low status, which may call into question one’s prospects for future acceptance.’

    Women aren’t grateful (if you are a regular/incel guy) until you “can hold something over them” …
    so I don’t understand why people are saying regular/incel guys … “must be considerate and thoughtful”.

    After all, as Albert Einstein said: “Insanity: doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results.”

    Like

  2. I can understand the temptation to go Galt. But I have a different time-orientation as a cryonicist, so I plan to play a long game and try to make it to a restored, healthy patriarchal society some day.

    Speaking of cryonics, I love to creep out feminist women signed up for it by telling them that the society which revives them could reflect more of my misogynist world view than their feminist nonsense. Feminism is doomed to lose the war of the cradle over the long run because it induces sterility in women who are susceptible for it, while the women in patriarchal marriages, like Ann Romney and Michelle Duggar, have plenty of children and invest resources into them. The future belongs to the people who show up for it, and that means it belongs to the grandchildren, great-grandchildren, etc., of today’s traditional fertile women. They will step over the ashes of today’s childless feminist women and become what the society of their era considers normal women with sensible views about their restricted sphere and roles in life.

    Liked by 1 person

  3. ^ The problem is … that “childless feminist women” are a rarity.
    Remember, even “Emma Watson” is feminist … and she’ll find a Chad Thundercock to breed with, all the while telling her daughter that (regular/incel) men are evil.
    Nowadays, the thirst is real, a fantastic amount of men are getting married to fat hogs. There has to be a way to defeat this evil.

    Like

  4. And to highlight something which feminists have stridently sought to ignore:
    There are plenty of cases where men, talking to women, have been accused of “harassing” them.
    I don’t know of any case where women, talking to men, have been accused of “harassing” them.
    This also allows lesbian and females who are rapists (yes, they do exist) to keep getting away.
    But … maybe feminism likes that 🙂

    Like

  5. “I am starting my research into countries overseas, with no feminism, where I can retire.”
    Oh? What countries are you thinking about?

    Like

  6. What I love about those liberals tools saying “B-but taxes also go for roads and shit” is how they don’t understand this is an argument for precisely nothing at all. The problem is that the part that goes for financing sluts ensures that nobody will need roads in the future at all, for example. Also, why would somebody who had been taken away any possibility to have a family of his own, since feminism turned women into feral lunatics, even care about roads? He’d be broken and devastated.

    Liked by 1 person

  7. What do roads have to do with the fact that women like men who’d mutilate them with box cutters more than men who’d want a serious relationship? In 50 years nobody will even use roads in such a society.

    Like

  8. Seriously, who would use roads in a society where fatherhood already usually is and will soon be, outside of some small groups, completely determined by who gets to a woman and rapes her first?

    Like

  9. And btw, I hope nobody replies to Anony O’mous seriously. This idiot is a troll/hater whose only other two posts were suggesting author of this blog and me to kill ourselves.

    Like

  10. I saw a T.V. movie about cryonics. A young woman is revived. Her husband is now an
    old man. He takes her face into his hands and says, “Can you forgive me for growing old?”
    She’s younger then her children! (Who are ungrateful and jealous.)
    Another good story about cryonics is a Twlight Zone episode. A man is going on a long
    space journey. He turns the suspended animation machine off on the ship, so he can age
    naturally. Meanwhile, his girlfriend has herself puts herself in suspended animation!
    He sends her away, even though she’s willing to stay. Did you read “Gift Of The Magi?”
    BTW, the gentleman COULD get girls if he joined ISIS. Does he think it’s worth it?

    Like

  11. @missattempts, Is your angle to get the blog banned if men talk about ISIS?
    Because, sometimes, … “women try to provoke men” and then say to Internet Service Providers “this blog makes me afraid, take it down?”

    Like

  12. Absolutely not!
    It is a truism that the ISIS soldier can get a bevy of women. He just can’t keep them very long.

    Like

  13. ^ Heh, heh,
    that’s also true of every man in a relationship unless he has more than one partner to choose from
    which is interesting, as
    “women hate players”
    but
    “women would rather date a player than a regular/incel guy until she can no longer get the players”

    Like

  14. I don’t work at the moment but i am still in the early 20’s and i already worked for about 2 years and i have been paying taxes while i was working. It pains me to think that even a few cents from my taxes would go to pay for other’s mistakes let alone thousands of $ in a lifetime.

    I would perfer to donate the money to homeless men if i have to give my money to someone.

    Like

  15. 100milesstare- please, do tell us how working made you have a “lovable” stamp on your forehead? Like it did with me and hundreds of thousands of others men. You’re a scum if you don’t work, you know? Nobody will want you if you don’t work, you know?

    Like

  16. caamib- I know that i am considered worthless to women if i do not work but same women treated me like a second class citizen even when i was a decent young man.

    Women only seek adventure and enjoy hopping from one man to another like a bee that flies from one flower to another. They have no soul and no love left in them by the time they reach my age as they have already wasted all their love on their first few boyfriends.

    After that women become emotionally dead and only date men to get resources and to be entertained.

    Like

  17. 100miles – I don’t think you got what I’m saying correctly in some aspects. I was mocking the standard liberal whining that many of us incels are unemployed (which isn’t even the actual case).

    I am claiming that women don’t care if you’re employed and that their current evolutionary pressures to mate with men who have most kids will more likely lead them to mate with illiterate Guatemalan peasants than decent, sane men. I don’t think you’re nothing to women if you don’t have a job. In fact, having a job demonstrates some sort of intelligence and capability, which are traits modern Western women dislike.

    Like

  18. @100milesstare:
    Welcome to my club, you need to leverage your assets to gain compliance from women (if the only thing they want you for, is to use you).
    the first thing to understand is …
    if a girl/woman you know only contacts you when they’re in trouble,
    the expectation is that you should be grateful to provide help for free to her.
    of course, if you are an employed person, rather than running the company – you can get in trouble if you want help … in exchange for your help.
    See how nicely women have sown up a racket, towards the men they’re not attracted to?

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s