I do not know why I am bothering here, as this has been discussed here over and over again. In my previous post I had a couple female commentors who are saying that I am wrong and that there are women out there who are nice to men. Of this I have no doubt. If you are in the top 20% of men, 90% of women will be nicer to you than Jesus Christ himself. If you are on the tail end of that bell curve, for whatever reason(there are millions), and wind up in lets say the bottom 50% of men, the percent of women who will have anything to do with you begins to drop off exponentially to the point that if you are in the bottom 20% of men (which I clearly am, for a variety of reasons), your mating options approach 0% (I have actually proved this mathematically, but am too lazy to post charts, equations, etc) and women will largely ignore you (neither mean or nice), or if they are forced to be around you (coworkers or relatives), they will be very nasty and attempt to push you out at all costs via character assassination. This is the main reason why I would never hire a woman, been there, done that. Once I gave a woman a chance and she tried spreading all kinds of nasty rumors about me. That will never happen again if I have anything to say about it. Besides, women never gave me a chance, so why should I return the favor. Women are clearly incapable of understanding this dynamic, as they think that all men have more sexual options than they do. They think this, because the top 20% of men are the only ones they acknowledge as existing, and these men certainly do have choice, yet it is all men are forced to give up their resources to the poor oppressed wimminz via taxes. Wait a minute, I thought a woman can do anything a man can do. Am I retarded? I must be missing something, because if this were the case, than why does the goverment need to facilitate stealing of men’s income to give to women in the form of welfare. If women can do anything a man can do, then why do family courts have an 83% bias for women, and in many cases, transfer 100% of the fathers income directly to the woman, under threat of jail. What is the man getting out of that transaction. How is the man supposed to support himself when he is working, but the court orders all his income to support the ex-wife’s “standard of living”. What is she doing for him? Is she still having sex with him? No, she is having sex with Chad or Tyronne, in her ex husbands bedroom inside of her ex-husbands house, which was given to her. No, he becomes homeless, living in his car, and does anybody care? Of course not, because society hates men. If that were me, that cunt had better get a new identity, because I would be hunting her to the ends of the earth and those family court scumbags as well. They love to make examples out of men, so men need to grab their balls and start making examples out of them as well. If you take away a man’s future, reason to live, and he has no path to justice, then murder IS justified.